The Town of Washington, Connecticut
Minutes: Inland Wetlands Commission
|
www.WashingtonCT.org The Town of Washington, Connecticut Minutes: Inland Wetlands Commission |
|
 |
Disclaimer: While we have attempted to reproduce them accurately, the electronic documents you see here are not the official public documents. Official copies may be obtained on paper from theTown Clerk . Also note that minutes of recent meetings are often not yet approved by the Commission, and are subject to correction.
Jump down to: General information about the Inland Wetlands Commission
May 8 •April 24 •April 10 •March 27 •March 13 •February 27 •February 13 •January 23 •January 9 •Previous years: 2012 • 2010 • 2009 • 2008 • 2007 • 2006 • 2005 • 2004 • 2003 • 2002
Posted: May 20, 2013 May 8, 2013
7:00 p.m., Upper Level Meeting Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Bedini, Ms. Cheney, Mr. LaMuniere, Mr. Papsin, Mr. Wadelton
ALTERNATE PRESENT: Mr. Davis
ALTERNATE ABSENT: Mr. Martino
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Ajello, Mrs. Hill
ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Rosiello, Mr. Charles, Mr. Szymanski, Mr. Angiollo, Mr. Sabin, Mr. Smith, Mr. Neff, Mr. Newman, Mr. Lyon, Mr. Lovelace, Mr. WhiteheadMr. Bedini called the Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and seated Members Bedini, Cheney, LaMuniere, Papsin, and Wadelton.
MOTION:
To include the following subsequent business not already posted on the agenda:
VI. Other Business: C. Smith/22 Parsonage Lane/Request to Amend Permit #IW-11-48/Driveway, Landscaping, Drainage.
By Mr. Wadelton, seconded by Ms. Cheney, and passed 5-0.
Consideration of the Minutes
The 4/24/13 Regular Meeting minutes were accepted as corrected.
Page 7 under Hayden, 4th line from end: After checking the recording, what Mr. Ajello actually said was that he had not yet issued an enforcement order.
Page 7 under Administrative Business: Mr. Ajello questioned the accuracy of statements reported to have been made by Mr. LaMuniere, but Mr. LaMuniere said the minutes correctly noted what he had said.
Page 5: Mr. Papsin said that Whitney was not the correct name of the applicant for Application #IW-13-08, but Mrs. Hill responded that that had been the name given on the application form submitted at the time. Mr. Sabin has since corrected it.
Page 3: The correct spelling of Papsin was noted approximately two thirds down the page.MOTION:
To accept the 4/24/13 Regular Meeting minutes as corrected.
By Ms. Cheney, seconded by Mr. LaMuniere, and passed 5-0.MOTION:
To accept the 5/3/13 Stiles site inspection minutes as written.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Mr. Papsin, and passed 5-0.MOTION:
To accept the 5/3/13 Hayden site inspection minutes as written.
By Mr. Papsin, seconded by Mr. LaMuniere, and passed 5-0.
Pending Applications
Collins/321, 323 West Shore Road/#IW-13-05/Cut Trees, Remove Invasives, Install Paths through Wetlands:
Pursuant to the discussion at the last meeting, Mr. Rosiello, landscape designer, said he had added notes regarding the required five year maintenance and monitoring program to his plan, “Landscape Concepts for N. W. Jay Collins,” sheet WL 3, dated 5/6/2013. He had also added the size of the proposed plantings and had added lawn area on #321 in the vicinity of wetlands flags #4 - #7, noting there would still be a 15 ft. buffer between the lawn and wetland area. Mr. Rosiello noted the different types of wetlands on the two lots. He said that except for the sections of the paths, which would have a layer of woodchips along the route where they don’t have to be elevated, the wetlands floor would have leaf litter and look like a forest floor. The numbers and kinds of plants to be planted were discussed. In response to a question by Mr. LaMuniere regarding whether the proposed planting took into consideration the more serious loss of canopy on #323, Mr. Rosiello specified that 75% of the more herbaceous plants will be planted on #321 and more of the trees and tall shrubs on #323. Mr. LaMuniere noted that a yearly meeting with the enforcement officer had not been specified. Mr. Rosiello added the note to the plan; “The agent will prepare a report and meet with the WEO on an annual basis.” The work proposed along the shoreline was described. Three trees will be cut and invasives removed. Wetland plants will be planted east of West Shore Road and a hedge will be maintained per the Zoning Regulations.MOTION:
To approve Application #IW-13-05 submitted by Mr. Collins to cut trees, remove invasives, install paths, and install mitigation and wetlands plants at 321 and 323 West Shore Road in accordance with the plan, “Landscape Concepts for N. W. Jay Collins,” sheet WL 3, by Mr. Rosiello, dated 5/6/13; the permit shall be valid for 5 years and is subject to the following conditions:
1. that the Land Use Office be notified at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work so the WEO can inspect and approve the erosion control measures,
2. that the property owner give the contractor copies of both the motion of approval and approved plans prior to the commencement of work, and
3. any change to the plans as approved must be submitted immediately to the Commission for reapproval.
By Mr. Wadelton, seconded by Mr. Papsin, and approved 4-0-1. Mr. LaMuniere abstained.Heyman/175 Calhoun Street/#IW-13-07/Application to Correct a Violation:
Mr. Szymanski, engineer, noted the soil scientist had signed the plans and a construction sequence had been submitted since the last meeting. The plans, “Existing Conditions Map and Remediation Plan,” by Arthur H. Howland and Assoc., revised to 5/8/13 was reviewed. Contrary to information on a DEEP map submitted by Mr. Ajello, Mr. Szymanski explained that the wetlands in this area were not connected due to the location of shallow ledge, which doesn’t allow the water to stay long enough for the soils to be designated as wetlands. He also noted that it had not yet been determined whether there were yellow iris to be removed from the edges of the pond, but said if there were, a second application would be submitted.MOTION:
To approve Application #IW-13-07 submitted by Mr. Heyman to correct a violation at 175 Calhoun Street per the map, “Existing Conditions Map and Remediation Plan,” by Arthur H. Howland and Assoc., dated 4/18/13 and revised to 5/8/13; the permit shall be valid for two years and is subject to the following conditions:
1. that the Land Use Office be notified at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work so the WEO can inspect and approve the erosion control measures,
2. that the property owner give the contractor copies of both the motion of approval and approved plans prior to the commencement of work, and
3. any change to the plans as approved must be submitted immediately to the Commission for reapproval.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Ms. Cheney, and passed 5-0.Chaterjee/31 Plumb Hill Road/#IW-13-08/Install Septic System and Play Area:
Mr. Papsin and Ms. Cheney recused themselves.
Mr. Davis was seated for Mr. Papsin.
Mr. Ajello noted he had inspected the property since the last meeting, silt fencing was in place, and said he had no concerns. Photos of the existing site conditions were circulated. Mr. Sabin submitted corrected application forms.MOTION:
To approve Application #IW-13-08 submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Chaterjee to repair the septic system and install a play area at 31 Plumb Hill Road; the permit shall be valid for 2 years and is subject to the following conditions:
1. that the Land Use Office be notified at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work so the WEO can inspect and approve the erosion control measures,
2. that the property owner give the contractor copies of both the motion of approval and approved plans prior to the commencement of work, and
3. any change to the plans as approved must be submitted immediately to the Commission for reapproval.
By Mr. Wadelton, seconded by Mr. LaMuniere, and passed 4-0. Mr. Davis was seated because Mr. Papsin and Ms. Cheney had recused themselves.Mr. Papsin and Ms. Cheney were reseated.
Karabell/112 River Road/#IW-13-09/Install Temporary Construction Access:
Mr. Sabin, landscape architect, presented his map, “Pool Area Permit Plan #1,” dated 3/15/13 and pointed out where the silt fence would be installed. He said that an anti tracking pad would be installed and trap rock spread only as needed during the 6 to 8 week pool construction project and that upon completion all disturbed areas would be reseeded. He expected the site would be green again by August. When asked if the access would become a permanent driveway, Mr. Sabin said it would not, but it would perhaps be used once in a while for pool service. Mr. LaMuniere recommended a condition that the access not be used for regular pool maintenance, but only for the pool construction.MOTION:
To approve Application #IW-13-09 submitted by Mr. Karabell for a temporary construction access at 112 River Road per the plans, “Pool Area Permit Plan #1,” by Mr. Sabin, dated 3/15/13; the permit shall be valid for two years and is subject to the following conditions:
1. that the Land Use Office be notified at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work so the WEO can inspect and approve the erosion control measures,
2. that the property owner give the contractor copies of both the motion of approval and approved plans prior to the commencement of work,
3. any change to the plans as approved must be submitted immediately to the Commission for reapproval, and
4. that the temporary access be used only for the pool construction; not for regular pool maintenance.
By Mr. Papsin, seconded by Ms. Cheney, and passed 5-0.
New Applications
Wilson/368 Nettleton Hollow Road/#IW-13-10/Driveway, Stone Work, Conduit:
Mr. Newman, agent, presented the undated sketch plan and detailed the proposed activities; 1) install a Belgium block curb and driveway apron, 2) construct two stone columns, and 3) dig a conduit for the electrical service for lights on the columns. He noted there is a stream within 60 feet of the driveway. He also noted a construction sequence had been submitted and erosion controls would be installed at the south end of the driveway. The conduit would be dug by hand and would be located along the inside edge of the driveway. Areas for the stockpiling of material were noted. Mr. Bedini asked for a topo map, conservation easement form, and a second copy of the sketch map.Nauiokas/170 Church Hill Road/#IW-13-11/Underground Utilities, Stonewall Construction, Driveway Resurface:
Ms. Cheney recused herself and Alternate Davis was seated.
Mr. Neff, engineer, presented his map, “Proposed Site Improvements,” dated 5/2/13. Mr. Neff described several activities proposed within the regulated area including the removal of the propane tank and installation of new tanks, relocation of the existing pool pump and filter, the reconstruction of a stonewall, and installation of a conduit to supply both water for irrigation and for a skating rink. He noted the 5/7/13 letter from Steep Rock Assn., the holder of the conservation easement on the property, granting permission for all of the proposed work. Installation of the dry well, cistern, and gravity fed system to the orchard and tennis court were discussed. Mr. Neff noted that although the area is very flat, silt fence would be installed between the propane tank to be removed and the brook. There were no questions or concerns raised. Mr. LaMuniere said there would be no impact on the wetlands.Ms. Cheney was reseated.
Other Business
Kinsela/73 Dark Entry Road/Request to Renew Permit #iw-08-28/ Construct Single Family Dwelling:
Mrs. Hill noted there were no changes proposed to the original approved plan. The map, “Subsurface Sewage Disposal System,” by Mr. Neff, revised to 5/8/08 was reviewed and Mr. Neff pointed out the location of the wetlands.MOTION:
To grant a 5 year extension of Permit #IW-08-28 issued to Mr. Kinsela to construct a single family dwelling at 73 Dark Entry Road.
By Mr. Wadelton, seconded by Ms. Cheney, passed 5-0.Town of Washington/Intersection of Walker Brook and Shinar Mt. Roads/Request to Amend Permit #IW-12-22/Replace Culvert:
Mr. Lyon noted that the application had been reviewed by the DEEP and the Army Corps of Engineers who required minor modifications to the original proposal. The set of revised plans, “Shinar Mountain Road Bridge,” by Arthur H. Howland and Assoc., no revision dates, were compared with the original plans dated 9/27/11, 6/12/12, 6/14/12, and 3/20/12. Mr. Lyon noted that the revisions to the plans included extending the armor coating, adding boulders along the streambank to help break up the flow of water for the fish, and adding references to the weir in the construction sequence.MOTION:
To approve the request by the Town of Washington to revise Permit #IW-12-22 to replace the culvert at the intersection of Walker Brook and Shinar Mountain Roads per the six sheet set of plans revised to 4/18/13.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Mr. Wadelton, and passed 5-0.Smith/22 Parsonage Lane/Request to Amend Permit #IW-11-48/Changes to the Driveway, Landscaping, and Drainage System:
Mr. Smith, Mr. Neff, engineer, and Mr. Sabin, landscape architect, were present. Mr. Sabin submitted his “Site and Landscape Plan,” revised to 5/6/13, which showed the revised driveway location, added the pool terrace and stonewall, deleted the boulder wall, and showed Belgium block along the driveway. He said the only work remaining was to plant the New England wet mix at the bottom of the basin and some additional wetlands plants, which could not be planted earlier due to standing water. Mr. Neff submitted his letter dated 5/8/13 and the map, “Drainage As-Built Plan,” dated 5/7/13, which showed the relocation of some catch basins, the addition of others, and the relocation of the downspout at the NE corner of the house so runoff would flow to the bioswale. Mr. Neff said the drainage system had worked effectively to date. Mr. Sabin noted the driveway edging prevented runoff towards the neighboring property. Mr. LaMuniere thought that replacing the originally approved pervious driveway pavement with gravel would increase the absorption of runoff and Mr. Neff agreed. Mr. Ajello asked if the driveway had been widened. Mr. Sabin responded that it varies from 11’ 6” to 13’ in width. Mr. Ajello questioned whether the gravel driveway would actually allow more water to infiltrate due to the compaction of the driveway sub base. Mr. Sabin and Mr. Neff said there would be equal if not greater permeability, a catch basin had been added to direct runoff toward the wetland, and whereas there previously had been no drainage system, the drainage system installed was large for a lot this size. Mr. Sabin added that the wet meadow had been restored as part of the project.MOTION:
To approve the request by Mr. and Mrs. Smith to amend Permit #IW-11-48 for changes to the driveway, landscaping, and drainage system at 22 Parsonage Lane in accordance with the maps, “Drainage As-Built Plan,” by Mr. Neff dated 5/7/13 and “Site and Landscape Plan,” by Mr. Sabin, dated 12/5/11 and revised to 5/6/13, noting that all the conditions of the original approval remain in place.
By Mr. Wadelton, seconded by Ms. Cheney, and passed 5-0.
Enforcement
Hayden/11 Loomarwick Road/Violation: Unauthorized Construction and Soil Disturbance:
An application had been expected, but had not yet been submitted.Stiles/15 Tinker Hill Road/Violation: Unauthorized Soil Disturbance and Clearing:
Mr. Szymanski, engineer, and Mr. Angiollo said that 29 pots of pachysandra had been planted and another 100 ordered to stabilize the steep slope and the area along the lake. They showed before and after photos. Mr. Angiollo stated that grasses and other plants were also growing now. Mr. LaMuniere noted the extensive clearing that had been done on a very steep slope and said the disturbed area must be stabilized. Mr. Szymanski offered to put down jute matting in addition to the pachysandra. Mr. Ajello stated 1) the clearing appeared to have been done to create a view, 2) the work had been done without the required permit, 3) a garden was being planted as opposed to the restoration of the natural shoreline habit, 4) to date the Commission had not allowed this kind of planting on the lake shore, 5) doing so would create a precedent for other property owners around the lake, 6) nutrients from all of the mulch spread on the slopes would seep into the lake, and 7) he compared this violation to one several years ago on Roxbury Road where the owner had been ordered to restore the wetlands. Mr. Angiollo stressed that the clearing had been done to clean up storm damage. Mr. Papsin agreed that the pachysandra planted was not consistent with the habitat around the lake and thought the immediate lakeside should be restored with native buffer plants. Mr. Szymanski said that although the plants were decorative, they would be densely planted and would spread quickly, again offered the jute mat, and asked what other stabilization measures the commissioners proposed. Mr. Papsin asked for a planting plan that was fitting for the area. Mr. LaMuniere asked if the plants proposed by the owner addressed the loss of canopy and said he would like the disturbed sections restored with a vegetative cover similar to the Task Force’s biofilter area. Mr. Angiollo said other than the two trees that had their tops snapped off in the storm, there was only one 60 ft. tree that had been taken down. He offered to plants shadblows, but did not think the soil there was deep enough for them to grow. Mr. Szymanski noted the purpose of the state statutes was to prevent adverse impacts to wetlands and watercourses and asked, considering what was proposed for stabilization, what would be the adverse impact to the lake. Mr. Ajello recommended an expert be hired to determine how serious the violation is. Mr. Szymanski noted the owner had agreed to pay any fines, was willing to monitor the newly planted areas to check for temporary impacts to the lake, and would provide weekly reports to the Commission. Jute matting was discussed. It was agreed to install the matting and to remove the wood chips on the north side. Mr. Wadelton and Ms. Cheney said they were not comfortable with what was proposed, although Mr. Wadelton said it was better than what had already been done. Ms. Cheney agreed that the Commission should consult with an expert. Mr. Ajello asked that silt fencing be installed until the expert could complete his report and it was determined what stabilization measures would be implemented. He said the issues to be resolved were the long term stabilization of the site and setting an example for other property owners around the lake. He also recommended that the Commission call its attorney to make sure it is proceeding properly with the handling of this violation. It was the consensus to refer this matter to Land Tech for review.Lovelace/75 Upper Church Hill Road/Violation: Unauthorized Soil Disturbance, Clearing, Excavation:
Mr. Lovelace submitted a letter dated 5/7/13 in which he explained the work he had done, and said he thought Mr. Ajello had told him a year ago that he could remove the junk from his property. He said the soil had been disturbed only enough to remove the debris, which had been trucked off site, and that the disturbed area had been raked, seeded, and mulched afterwards. Photos of the planted area were circulated. The map, “Proposed Site Plan,” by Mr. Neff, revised to 9/6/04 was reviewed and the location of the large wetlands on the property was noted. Mr. Ajello said the unauthorized work had been both in Popple Swamp and in the regulated area and said there would have been less disturbance if the work had been done by hand. The disturbed area was approximately 100 ft. by 40 ft. He showed a photo of a backhoe excavating the site. Mr. Ajello said the work had continued after he had made his inspection and had determined there was a violation. Mr. Lovelace said the work had been completed over the weekend and the enforcement letter had not arrived until Monday. Mr. Ajello asked whether the planted area would be lawn or hayed and asked that the wetlands boundary be marked so that wetlands soils would not be routinely mowed as lawn. He did not think there would be permanent damage, but said a fine would be issued as the work was unauthorized. Ms. Cheney asked whether it would be appropriate to also fine the contractor. Mr. Ajello said that would be appropriate for repeat offenders. Mr. Bedini and the other commissioners agreed the area should be marked so it would not be mowed. Mr. Whitehead, adjoining property owner who hays the field, objected because putting in stakes or shrubs would complicate the mowing and would make it take longer for him to do. Mr. Lovelace agreed to somehow establish the wetland soils boundary beyond which there would be no mowing and to pay the fine.Enforcement Report
Bee Brook Condos/Juniper Meadow Road:
Mr. Wadelton recused himself.
Mr. Ajello inspected the site. He said the catch basins would be adjusted, but since they weren’t piped to the stream, an Inland Wetlands permit was not required. There were no questions and the commissioners agreed a permit was not required.Hayden/11 Loomarwick Road/Violation: Unauthorized Construction and Soil Disturbance:
Mr. Ajello will send a citation for the unauthorized work. An application is expected, but it was not known whether it would be an application to correct a violation or an after the fact application. It was noted that there are also zoning issues with the unauthorized work. While the Commission did not want to review an application that does not comply with the Zoning Regulations, Mr. Ajello explained that legally applications go to Inland Wetlands first.Lautier/56 June Road:
Mr. Ajello reported there had been activity within 100 ft of the watercourse that had not been approved on the original plan. He said a revision of the permit was needed. Mr. Bedini asked Mr. Ajello to send Mr. Lautier a letter to notify him he is in violation of his permit.Samgold, LLC./298 West Shore Road:
Mr. Ajello reported that a patio that was not included in the Agent Approval was under construction and a service trench had been dug. Ms. Cheney said that if the work had exceeded the permit issued, a notice of violation should be sent and a citation should be issued. Mr. Ajello said he would discuss the matter with the contractor.
MOTION:
To adjourn the meeting. By Mr. Wadelton.Mr. Bedini adjourned the meeting at 9:50 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill
Land Use Administrator
Posted: April 27, 2013 April 24, 2013
6:43 p.m., Upper Level Meeting Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Bedini, Ms. Cheney, Mr. LaMuniere, Mr. Papsin, Mr. Wadelton
ALTERNATES ABSENT: Mr. Davis, Mr. Martino
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Ajello, Mrs. HillSHOW CAUSE HEARING
Heyman/175 Calhoun Street/Enforcement Order for Unauthorized Clearing and Soil Disturbance:
Mr. Bedini called the hearing to order at 6:43 p.m. and seated Members Bedini, Cheney, LaMuniere, Papsin, and Wadelton.He noted that an application to correct the violation had been received and that the property owner was not going to object to the order and so the show cause hearing was not necessary.
MOTION:
To close the show cause hearing to consider whether the 4/17/13 enforcement order issued to Mr. Heyman for unauthorized clearing and soil disturbance at 175 Calhoun Street should be upheld.
By Ms. Cheney, seconded by Mr. Wadelton, and passed 5-0.Mr. Bedini closed the hearing at 6:44 p.m.
7:00 p.m.
REGULAR MEETINGALTERNATE PRESENT: Mr. Davis
ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Astin, Mr. Smith, Mr. Showalter, Mr. Rosiello, Mr. Szymanski, Atty. Coploff, Mr. Angiola, Mr. Sabin, Mr. Hayden, PressMr. Bedini called the Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and seated Members Bedini, Cheney, LaMuniere, Papsin, and Wadelton.
MOTION:
To include the following subsequent business not already posted on the agenda:
V. New Applications:
B. Whitney/31 Plumb Hill Road/ #IW-13-08/Install Septic System and Play Area,
C. Karabell/112 River Road/#IW-13-09/Temporary Construction Access.
By Mr. Wadelton, seconded by Ms. Cheney, and passed 5-0.Consideration of the Minutes
The 3/27/13 Regular Meeting minutes were accepted as corrected. In the third line down on page 3, “#323” should be “#321.”
MOTION:
To accept the 3/27/13 Regular Meeting minutes as corrected.
By Mr. Wadelton, seconded by Ms. Cheney, and passed 5-0.The 4/10/13 Regular Meeting minutes were accepted as corrected. On page 5, in the seventh line under Heyman, “of” should be “if.”
MOTION:
To accept the 4/10/13 Regular Meeting minutes as corrected.
By Ms. Cheney, seconded by Mr. Wadelton, and passed 5-0.
Pending Applications
Collins/321 and 323 West Shore Road/#IW-13-05/Cut Trees, Remove Invasives, Install Paths through Wetlands:
Mr. Rosiello, landscape designer, submitted the revised plan, “Landscape Concepts for N.W. Jay Collins,” by Mr. Rosiello, no revision date, but marked received on 4/24/13. The revisions included 1) a small plank crossing over the swale near wetlands flag #11 on #323, the #323 boardwalk was moved to enter the wetlands between wetlands flags #9 and #10, and notes were added regarding restoration of the eroded area on #323 and limiting the mowing of the steep slopes on both lots to 2 to 4 times per year. Mr. Rosiello described the wetlands violation by Mr. Collins’ workers that had been reported on April 18 and said he had prepared an extensive mitigation plan to compensate for those plants that had been improperly removed from the wetlands. Mr. Ajello reported there had been a second violation today and a photo of the workers doing further unauthorized work was circulated. Mr. Rosiello said he now proposed to plant a taller understory canopy, said there were a lot of native plants coming up and these would monitored for three years so that invasives don’t take over, said any invasives would be hand pulled after consulting with the Commission, and reported that in the future Mr. Collins would not hire any workers who had not been OK’d by Mr. Rosiello. Mr. Ajello read Mr. Collins’ 4/24/13 email and said he had also called after learning of the second violation. Mr. LaMuniere thought the mitigation plan was a good one, but said this was a major violation, which required a fine under Section E of Ordinance #720. There was a brief discussion regarding whether a fine should be levied. Mr. Rosiello specified the types and number of plants he had added to the planting plan. Mr. Wadelton said fines should be reserved for intentional violations and pointed out that the improved mitigation plan would place considerable additional financial burden on the property owner. Ms. Cheney agreed. Mr. Bedini noted that in the past, a violation had been considered a violation whether or not it had been intentional. He asked what the fine would be in this case. Mr. Ajello noted that because this was the second violation in a ten year period and it had taken place in the wetlands and had a direct impact on the wetlands, the fine would be $1000. He said the disturbed area was only a quarter acre, he thought Mr. Collins would invest a lot in the restoration work, and although the property owner is ultimately responsible for violations on his property, he would not like to see the mitigation derailed due to a fine. Mr. Rosiello said the cost of the plantings would be $5000 without the fine. Mr. Papsin thought if the owner would restore the damaged area, if a monitoring system was in place for at least three years, and if only knowledgeable people worked on site a fine would not be necessary. Mr. LaMuniere disagreed, saying the previous verbal agreement to allow the removal of invasives by hand had failed and so the Commission should require a precisely written agreement regarding the control of the proposed operation before making any decision. Mr. Rosiello thought this could be handled as a condition of approval. Instead of the Commission trying to craft conditions on the spot, Mr. Bedini asked Mr. Rosiello to draft a detailed description of the terms agreed upon. Mr. Papin asked him to include a detailed work sequence and 5 year monitoring plan. Regarding the revised plan presented, Mr. LaMuniere said he would have preferred to have the boardwalk on #323 enter the wetlands nearer to wetland flag #9. A vote on this application is expected at the next meeting.The Gunnery, Inc./100 Green Hill Road/#IW-13-06/Renovate Soccer Field:
Mr. Smith, surveyor, submitted a revised cover sheet and sheets 4 and 5, “Turf Renovation Plan,” and “Sedimentation and Erosion Control,” both by Buck and Buck, LLC, revised to 4/16/13. Mr. Astin said the applicant had responded to Mrs. Hill’s 4/8/13 request for additional information by adding the following notes to the plans; 1)the design engineer will be responsible for inspecting the erosion and sedimentation controls, 2) the Land Use Office will be notified at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work, and 3) the location of the limit of disturbance line. The commissioners thought it would be OK to designate the school as the party responsible for inspecting the erosion controls. Also, Mr. Smith corrected the address on the application form and noted a statement regarding the typical earthwork equipment to be used had been submitted. He said the school planned to begin work on May 15.MOTION:
To approve Application #IW-13-06 submitted by The Gunnery, Inc. to renovate the soccer field at 100 Green Hill Road per the plans submitted on 4/3/13 and revised to 4/16/13; the permit shall be valid for 2 years and is subject to the following conditions:
1. that the Land Use Office be notified at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work so the WEO can inspect and approve the erosion control measures,
2. that the property owner give the contractor copies of both the motion of approval and approved plans prior to the commencement of work, and
3. any change to the plans as approved must be submitted immediately to the Commission for reapproval.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Mr. Wadelton and passed 5-0.
New Applications
Heyman/175 Calhoun Street/#IW-13-07/Application to Correct Violation
Mr. Szymanski, engineer, presented the map, “Existing Conditions Map,” by Arthur H. Howland & Assoc., dated 4/18/13 on which all the trees greater than 6 inches in diameter within 100 feet of the wetlands and adjoining property had been shown. He said the only direct impact to wetlands had been the installation of the 4 inch pipe adjacent to the pond, which would require the restoration of a 150 ft. X 15 ft. disturbed area with native plants and New England wetland mix. He noted another very small area would also be restored. He did agree that a violation had occurred because there had been clearing and soil disturbance within 100 ft. of wetlands. The location of ledge and wetlands on the property was briefly noted. Mr. Ajello asked what the long term maintenance plan should be. Mr. Szymanski said the disturbed areas would be fully planted and that more would be planted than was actually required. Mr. Ajello asked for precautions so that the plants would not be mowed down and Mr. Szymanski said the corners of the non mow area could be marked with poles. Mr. Szymanski said he would add hand removal of yellow iris from around the pond to the application if it is determined that this invasive plant is growing there. Mr. LaMuniere asked for a sequence of construction. Mr. Szymanski said he would provide this and the other documentation requested by Mrs. Hill for the next meeting. After reviewing the wetlands flagging, Mr. Ajello noted the extent of the unauthorized work was not as much as originally thought and that the owner had been cooperative in addressing the problem. Mr. Bedini noted that the enforcement order would remain in effect.Whitney/31 Plumb Hill Road/#IW-13-08/Installation of Septic System and Play Area:
Mr. Papsin and Ms. Cheney recused themselves. Alternate Davis was seated.
Mr. Sabin, landscape architect, described the area where the work would be done as being steeply sloped, dropping down to a wet meadow. The plan, “Chaterjee Residence, Final Preliminary Concept,” by Mr. Sabin, dated 3/20/13 was reviewed. Mr. Sabin pointed out the proposed location for the new septic system and said a boulder wall would be built and the hillside cut and filled to create a level play area. All proposed work would be done in the existing lawn area. Although the work would be in the regulated area, he said it would have no direct impact on the wetlands. Mr. Sabin said the Health Dept. had already approved the septic system. Mr. Ajello asked if the Health Dept. had been aware of the presence of wetlands. Mr. Bedini and Mr. Wadelton did not think flagging of the wetlands was necessary and it was the consensus that a site inspection was not needed, either. Mr. Sabin pointed out the temporary construction access and the location of silt fencing. Mr. Sabin said that work beyond the 100 ft. setback had begun and would continue and that he would provide the information requested by Mrs. Hill for the next meeting. Mr. Ajello said he would inspect the site and take photos for review at the next meeting.Mr. Papsin and Ms. Cheney were reseated.
Karabell/112 River Road/#IW-13-09/Temporary Construction Access:
Mr. Sabin, landscape architect, presented the plan, “Pool Area Permit Plan #1,” by Mr. Sabin, dated 3/15/13. He pointed out the location of an old roadway to be used as temporary access to the pool construction site and of wetlands adjacent to this “road” and said the area drains away from the wetlands. Gravel and crushed stone would be spread and an anti tracking pad installed and all disturbed areas restored to lawn by the end of spring. Mr. LaMuniere noted that the Commission had allowed temporary construction access for projects on other properties in the past. Mr. Sabin explained that once the pool construction was completed, the existing driveway would be used for normal maintenance activities. Mr. Sabin will submit additional information to complete the application by the next meeting.
Other Business
Ficalora/10 Sunrise Lane/Request for 5 Year Extension of Permit #IW-03-55/Construct Single Family Dwelling:
In response to questions raised at the last meeting, Mr. Ajello researched the state statutes and found that permits may not be valid or extended for more than 10 years. This permit has already been extended once, which brought it to the 10 year maximum. Mr. Ficalora will be advised that he must submit a new application and his renewal fee will be returned.Canal/142 Sabbaday Lane/Request to Renew Permit #IW-11/14/ Application of Herbicide to Pond:
Mr. Ajello reported this permit will expire at the end of May, but treatment is proposed for June/July 2013. No changes were proposed to the DEEP permit and the criteria of the original local approval will remain in effect.MOTION:
To grant a 2 year extension of Permit
#IW-11-14 issued to Mr. Canal for the application of pesticides to his pond at 142 Sabbaday Lane.
By Mr. Wadelton, seconded by Ms. Cheney, and passed 5-0.Town of Washington/Intersection of Walker Brook and Shinar Mt. Roads/Request to Revise Permit #IW-12-22/Replace Culvert:
Minor changes to the work approved are required by the Army Corps of Engineers and the DEEP. Mr. Lyon will be ready with the request at the next meeting.
Enforcement
Stiles/15 Tinker Hill Road/Violation: Unauthorized Clearing and Soil Disturbance:
Mr. Angiola, Atty. Coploff, and Mr. Szymanski, engineer, were present. Mr. Ajello reported that a notice of violation had been issued on 4/18/13 for unauthorized clearing, soil disturbance, and installation of an irrigation system and he circulated photos of the disturbed area and a 2010 photo of the area before it was disturbed. Mr. Angiola said that storm damaged trees and poison ivy had been removed and in their place over 400 plants had been planted. Mr. Szymanski confirmed that he had inspected the property today and the 400 sage plants were coming up. He also stated that heavy mulching of the slopes had been done. Mr. Ajello and Mr. Papsin were concerned that the fine sweet peat mulch and/or its nutrients would migrate into the lake. Mr. Szymanski responded that the mulch is organic and its impact to the lake would be similar to decomposing leaves. He said a buffer could be added at the edge of the lake to alleviate that concern. In addition to the irrigation system, Mr. Ajello said that curbing had been installed along the Town road and this would concentrate the runoff at both ends. Mr. Angiola said they had extended the curbing that was there when they purchased the property and that there was no cement between the blocks so the water could flow through. The commissioners informed Mr. Angiola that he should have come in for a permit before beginning any work. Mr. Szymanski said he would draw up a planting plan, although Mr. Angiola stated that much of the area had already been replanted. A site inspection was scheduled for Friday, May 3, 2013 at 5:30 p.m.Hayden/11 Loomarwick Road/Violation: Unauthorized Construction and Soil Disturbance:
Mr. Hayden was present and said he did not dispute that there was a violation. Photos of the unauthorized work that had begun were circulated. The commissioners reviewed the entry in Mr. Ajello’s 4/24/13 enforcement report. Mr. Hayden said he removed the wooden stairs that had been in need of repair and had dug out part of the bank and had pushed the stone wall back 5 feet, which had increased the size of the level area near the shoreline. He apologized that he had not contacted the Land Use Office and said he would submit an application at the next meeting. He said he had already installed silt fencing. Mr. Ajello said he had not yet issued a notice of violation, but said he would do so at the request of the Commission. A site inspection was scheduled for Friday, May 3, 2013 at 6:00 p.m.
Administrative Business
Regarding Stiles and Hayden above, Mr. Ajello said he had intended to issue first level fines for both of these violations. Mr. LaMuniere stated that notices of violation should also be issued. Mr. Ajello pointed out that the plants such as poison ivy, which had stabilized the bank had been removed and had been replaced with garden-like planting, which did not resemble the sample buffer area planting further down the lake shore. Mr. Wadelton thought these two violations merited fines as the property owners had been directly involved. Mr. LaMuniere said the Commission must abide by its Regulations and treat violators in a consistent manner. Mr. Wadelton suggested then that the Regulations be amended to state that the Commission does not have the authority to waive fines. Mr. Ajello noted that fines are governed by Town ordinance, not the Regulations. Mr. Bedini stated that the Enforcement Officer is authorized to issue notices of violation and impose fines without the approval of the Commission, but did think the WEO could be flexible when a property owner was cooperating.Regarding the legal procedure for site inspections, Mr. Wadelton stated that a commissioner may make a drive by inspection but may not walk on the property by himself. The reason for this is that all commissioners must have the same information upon which to base their decision and so should walk the property at one time with the group staying together on site.
Mr. Ajello briefly reviewed his 4/24/13 enforcement report.
MOTION:
To adjourn the meeting. By Mr. Wadelton.Mr. Bedini adjourned the Meeting at 9:15 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill, Land Use Administrator
Posted: April 17, 2013 April 10, 2013
7:00 p.m., Upper Level Meeting Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Bedini, Mr. LaMuniere, Mr. Papsin, Mr. Wadelton
MEMBER ABSENT: Ms. Cheney
ALTERNATE ABSENT: Mr. Martino
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Ajello, Mrs. Hill
ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Smith, Mr. Astin, Mr. Showalter, Mr. Sabin, Mr. Rosiello, Mr./Mrs. Smith, Mr. DavisMr. Bedini called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and seated Members Bedini, LaMuniere, Papsin, and Wadelton.
MOTION:
To add the following subsequent business to the agenda:
VII. Enforcement/Letter re: Notice of Violation to Heyman/175 Calhoun Street.
By Mr. Wadelton, seconded by Mr. Papsin, and passed 4-0.
Consideration of the Minutes
MOTION:
To accept the 4/4/13 Collins site inspection
minutes as written.
By Mr. Papsin, seconded by Mr. Wadelton, and passed 4-0.The 3/27/13 Regular Meeting minutes will be considered at the next meeting.
Pending Application
Collins/321, 323 West Shore Road/#IW-13-05/Cut Trees, Remove Invasives, Install Paths through Wetlands:
Mr. Rosiello, landscaper, presented his plan, “Landscape Concepts for N. W. Jay Collins,” dated April 2013. He proposed to plant 35 trees at the north end of #323 and bordering the wetlands on #321 and 150 native shrubs. He said a change since the last meeting had been the elimination of the two side paths on #321, noting the center path was still proposed. Regarding #321 Mr. LaMuniere said he had no problem with the plan but asked if a boardwalk was proposed. Mr. Rosiello said there probably would not be a boardwalk between wetlands flags #4 and #5, but there would be a four plank wide boardwalk for the rest of the path because that area looks wet and he did not want to impact the flow of water there. Mr. LaMuniere noted the steep slope on #323. Mr. Rosiello proposed no mowing on the slope. Mr. LaMuniere noted the proposal was to cut the majority of trees and he questioned what impact this loss of canopy would have on this very good quality wetlands. Mr. Rosiello said he had tried to keep the trees to be cut to provide a view in as narrow a swath as possible, 60 feet in width, and noted they were not all healthy. He said new trees would be planted along the wetland border and that the proposed shrubs, which would grow up to 15 feet tall, would cool the wetlands. Mr. LaMuniere noted approximately 350 feet of boardwalk was proposed on #323. He asked why this was proposed entirely in wetlands when there was an alternate route partially in uplands soils 90 feet to the south that would be less destructive to the wetlands. Mr. Rosiello said the proposed route would make it easier to monitor invasives in the wetlands and could be used as a teaching tool for the owner’s children. He also said the installation of the boardwalk would be a one time disturbance. Mr. LaMuniere stated, and Mr. Papsin agreed, that this proposal was extreme given there was an alternate route available. Mr. Papsin also thought that most of the trees should not be cut until the newly planted shrubs had time to establish themselves and restore the canopy. Mr. LaMuniere asked if the proposed shrub coverage would provide the equivalent cooling function as the tree canopy to be removed. Mr. Ajello said it was not necessarily bad to open up some of the canopy if a diverse multi story canopy remained. Mr. Rosiello discussed the size, location, and growth rates of the proposed shrubs. Mr. Wadelton said he tended to defer to the plan proposed by the professional and not to change it unless there was a compelling reason and noted that once in place, the boardwalk would be benign. Mr. Papsin, Mr. LaMuniere, and Mr. Bedini said they were OK with the cutting of the trees and planting of native shrubs, but asked if there was a compromise location for the boardwalk. It was agreed that the path could cross the lawn and swale and enter the wetlands in the vicinity of wetlands flag #9. Mr. LaMuniere noted this would cut the work proposed in the wetlands by half. Mr. Rosiello will consult with Mr. Collins. Mr. Ajello noted the drainage at the top of #321 and asked if any mitigation was proposed. Mr. Rosiello said he would talk to the Country Club regarding cleaning out the swale to divert some of the water away from the property and said there would be no mowing of the steep slope and that a wildflower mix would be used to restore the toe of the slope on the west side of the driveway. Mr. Ajello recommended temporary monuments to define/protect the wildflower area until it is established. Mr. Bedini asked that all of this work be added to the plan. Mr. Ajello noted that someone had excavated an unauthorized conduit trench along the watercourse. The commissioners agreed that the removal by hand of the invasive plants could begin immediately.
New Application
The Gunnery, Inc./100 Green Hill Road/#IW-13-06/Renovate Soccer Field:
Mr. Smith, surveyor, Mr. Astin, engineer, and Mr. Showalter from The Gunnery represented The Gunnery. The plans, “Soccer Field Renovation,” 5 sheets, by Smith and Company and Buck and Buck, submitted 4/3/13 were reviewed. Mr. Smith pointed out the location of the field, the contours, and the wetlands flags. He stated the proposal is to correct the problem of standing water on three areas of the field per a carefully engineered plan by Buck and Buck. He noted the existing septic system is located under the field and that the 100 ft. regulated area runs through the southern corner of the field. Mr. Astin said all of the proposed work would take place on the grass area within the existing fence and would not touch the sloped area. He briefly reviewed the proposed work and construction sequence, which, he said, was based on recommendations by the UConn Cooperative Service to improve the drainage. Top soil will be stripped to a depth of 10 inches and stockpiled on site. A series of underdrains will be installed just below the surface over which septic sand and then top soil will be spread. Irrigation for the field will also be installed. All the stockpiled material will be reused on site and the resulting unified slope will be 2.2%. Mr. Astin detailed the erosion control measures to be installed and said the field would be sodded after the final grading. Storm drainage will tie into the existing storm drainage system and outlet, which already has a rip rapped apron. Post work peak drainage flows will not change, nor will the size of the field. Mr. Astin said the work was scheduled to be done between May 15 and June 30 so that the new sod would be ready for the school’s fall sports. Mr. Smith noted the detailed erosion and sedimentation control plan was included on sheet #5 and said he would revise the submission to include information requested by Mrs. Hill in her 4/8/13 email.
Enforcement
Smith/22 Parsonage Lane/Non Compliance with Permit #IW-11-48:
At the last meeting the commissioners had requested that Mr. Ajello write to the property owners to ask that they attend the next meeting to explain why the work done had not been according to the approved plan. Mr. Sabin, landscape architect, responded point by point to Mr. Ajello’s 3/28/13 letter. Question #2: Why was a 2 ft. deep sediment basin substituted for the rain garden? Mr. Sabin said the rain garden had been constructed with a 2 ft. berm as approved. However, the wetland emergent plug plants had not yet been planted, but this would be done this spring. Mr. Sabin added that the rain garden soil profile had not been included on Mr. Neff’s plan, but the soils used were the same as those used for the Lake Waramaug biofilter. Mr. Ajello asked if the basin would require maintenance. Mr. Sabin said this would be minimal. It was the consensus that the rain garden construction was OK. Question #1: Were there changes to the underground drainage plan? Mr. Sabin said the original plans had shown one pipe off the roof leaders, but two side by side pipes from the foundation drains had been installed in the same location. Mr. Ajello said the drain flows to the bio swale area. #3: When asked why so much stormwater bypasses the drainage system, Mr. Sabin said it was because the job was not yet completed. He said the driveway still had to be regraded and the curb stones installed. He pointed out the direction of the stormwater runoff and how the curb would direct it to the rain garden. Mr. Ajello added that some of the water would infiltrate when the pervious pavement was installed. Mr. Sabin also pointed out that one of the catch basins was not yet fully functional. #4 and #5: Was the boulder reinforced planted berm along the driveway redesigned? How will the mulch be retained when the erosion controls are removed? Mr. Sabin said the boulders were no longer needed for stabilization since the driveway location had been shifted allowing for a more gradual grade in that area. He said the plants would hold the berm. #6 and #7: Why are there two pipes instead of one entering the bio swale and why do they exit further into the swale than specified on the plan? Mr. Sabin said these pipes had since been cut and were now beneath the stones. The Commission asked Mr. Sabin to submit a revised plan showing all of the revisions and a letter to request the revision of Permit #IW-11-48 accompanied by the $25 fee. Mr. Ajello read three letters dated 4/5/13, 4/8/13, and 4/10/13 from Mr. Caroe, the adjoining property owner. It was the consensus that the improvements made to date as well the completion of the work still to be done would address most of Mr. Caroe’s concerns. It was noted, however, that the adjoining Caroe property had wetlands soils and that it was not the Commission’s responsibility to resolve long standing drainage problems in this area.
Other Business
Ficalora/10 Sunrise Lane/#IW-03-55/Request for 5 Year Extension:
It was noted there were no changes proposed to the approved plans. Mr. Ajello pointed out that this would be the second five year renewal, making this a 15 year permit, which he thought exceeded the maximum permitted. He will research the statutes to find out if this is allowed and will report back at the next meeting.Canal/142 Sabbaday Lane/Notification of State Permit for Aquatic Weed Control:
Although the state has issued a permit, a local Inland Wetlands permit is also required. Mr. Canal has not yet applied for the local permit. Mr. Ajello will notify Mr. Canal that this is required.
Enforcement
In addition to the information already listed in Mr. Ajello’s 4/10/13 Enforcement Report, the following was discussed:Heymman/175 Calhoun Street:
Mr. Ajello reported that although there had been unauthorized work in a regulated area near a hillside seep, a report by a soil scientist indicated there were no wetlands in the area disturbed. He said more documentation was needed; either the wetlands should be flagged on the property or a more accurate soils report map submitted. Mr. Ajello thought it would it would be helpful of recent improvements to the property were also put on the map. It was the consensus that the Commission should have an accurate map before conducting a site inspection.Hochberg/15/Couch Road/Unauthorized Excavation of Pond and Deposition of Material:
Mr. Wadelton and Mr. Papsin asked if Mr. Hochberg had ever paid his citation. He had not because the Selectmen’s Office has not scheduled the required citation hearing. It was estimated this violation is two years old and so the Selectmen will again be urged to schedule the hearing.
There was no administrative business to discuss, nor was there any reason the hold an executive session.
MOTION:
To adjourn the meeting. By Mr. Wadelton.Mr. Bedini adjourned the meeting at 8:53 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill
Land Use Administrator
Posted: April 17, 2013 March 27, 2013
7:00 p.m., Upper Level Meeting Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ms. Cheney, Mr. LaMuniere, Mr. Papsin, Mr. Wadelton
MEMBER ABSENT: Mr. Bedini
ALTERNATE ABSENT: Mr. Martino
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Ajello, Mrs. Hill
ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Rosiello, Mr. Alex, Mr. Bowman, Mr. NeffMr. Wadelton called the Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and seated Members Cheney, LaMuniere, Papsin, and Wadelton.
MOTION:
To add the following subsequent business to the agenda:
V. New Applications
A. Collins/ 321-323 West Shore Road/#IW-13-05/Cut Trees, Remove Invasives, Install Path Through Wetlands.
By Ms. Cheney, seconded by Mr. Papsin, and passed 4-0.Consideration of the Minutes
The 3/13/13 Regular Meeting minutes were accepted as corrected.
Page 1, 6th line from bottom: Change Mr. “Charles” to “LaMuniere.
Page 3, #8 in the top paragraph: Add “sequence” after “construction.”MOTION:
To accept the 3/13/13 Regular Meeting minutes as corrected.
By Mr. Papsin, seconded by Mr. LaMuniere, and passed 4-0.
Pending Application
Regional School District #12/159 South Street/#IW-13-04/ Stream Crossing:
Mr. Alex presented his revised plans, “Site Analysis Plan,” by Mr. G. Alex, (signed by Mr. T. Michael Alex) revised 3/25/13, an enlargement of the immediate area where the crossing was proposed, no title, signature, or date, and “2012 Senior Project,” by Mr. G. Alex, revised to 3/25/13. Details that were added to the plans as requested by the Commission at the last meeting included the sequence of construction, silt fence details, grass line, limit of disturbance line, elevations, scale, and measurements. He noted the slope would be 2:1 and that 3 to 5 yards of fill would be deposited. There were no questions and Mr. LaMuniere stated that all of the information requested at the last meeting had been provided. Mr. Alex said he expected to complete the project within 2 to 3 weeks.MOTION:
To approve Application #IW-13-04 for Regional School District #12 at 159 South Street to install a stream crossing per the plans, “Site Analysis Plan,” by Mr. Alex, revised to 3/25/13 and “2012 Senior Project,” by Mr. Alex, revised to 3/25/13; the permit shall be valid for 2 years and is subject to the following conditions:
1. that the Land Use Office be notified at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work so the WEO can inspect and approve the erosion control measures,
2. that the property owner give the contractor copies of both the motion of approval and approved plans prior to the commencement of work, and
3. any change to the plans as approved must be submitted immediately to the Commission for reapproval.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Ms. Cheney, and passed 4-0.
New Application
Collins/321-323 West Shore Road/#IW-13-05/Cut Trees, Remove Invasives, Install Paths Through Wetlands:
Mr. Rosiello represented the property owner. He presented reduced scale maps, “Wetland Concept for Jay Collins,” dated 3/13 and a property survey by Arthur H. Howland and Assoc., dated 2/19/2003. For #323 Mr. Rosiello proposed clearing in the wetlands for a view from the main house, installing a path with some sections elevated through the wetlands, removing invasives, and replanting for mitigation. He noted that when the IWC has approved a location for the path, he will draw up a complete planting plan. Clearing for a view was also proposed for #321. In addition, a restoration and wildflower mix would be planted in the upland review area between the wetlands and severe slopes and the boulders on site would be used to delineate the path. The trees to be removed were discussed. Mr. Rosiello proposed to cut mostly healthy, but small caliper trees in the wetlands as well as four large hazardous trees in the upland review area on #323. All debris would be hauled off site. He noted the wetlands are delineated with blue flags on site and that there are pipes under the driveway, which empty into associated swales that flow down into the wetlands below. It was the consensus to schedule a site inspection on Thursday, April 4, 2013 at 5:30 p.m.
Other Business
Lancaster/244 West Shore Road/Request to Revise Permit #IW-12-24/ Demolish and Rebuild House:
Mr. Papsin recused himself.
Mr. Neff, engineer, presented his plan, “Proposed Site Plan,” revised to 3/22/13 and explained that the architect had determined that the existing foundation was not in good condition and so recommended the house be torn down and rebuilt in the same location and to the same dimensions. Mr. Ajello read a portion of a letter from the architect dated 3/22/13. Mr. LaMuniere asked if there were any wetlands implications. Mr. Ajello said there shouldn’t be as the rest of the activities under the approved permit would be unchanged. Mr. Ajello spoke briefly about zoning issues. Mr. Neff noted that the basement is now half crawl space, half full, but would be a complete full basement when the new one was built. He said that all excess excavated material would be removed from the site. Mr. LaMuniere stated that good anti tracking pads would be needed to prevent mud from getting on the road and down into the lake. Mr. Neff noted it was a tight lot and he was not sure there was room for a 50 ft. anti tracking pad. Mr. Ajello asked how the well would be abandoned. Mr. Neff explained that the Health Dept. would issue a permit to the well driller and the well would be abandoned per the state Health Dept. regulations.MOTION:
To amend Permit #IW-12/24 to include the demolition and reconstruction of the Lancaster house at 244 West Shore Road per the plan. “Proposed Site Plan,” by Mr. Neff, dated 7/31/12 and revised to 3/22/13 with the condition that the driveway shall be monitored and cleaned on a regular basis to prevent mud from tracking onto West Shore Road.
By Ms. Cheney, seconded by Mr. LaMuniere, passed 3-0.Mr. Papsin was reseated.
Enforcement Report
In addition to the information noted in Mr. Ajello’s 3/27/13 report, the following was noted:Bartlett/26 Cook Street/Planting Trees:
Mr. Ajello will issue an agent approval because the Bartletts obtained permission to access the work site from an adjoining property rather than through wetlands.Smith/22 Parsonage Lane/Non Compliance with Permit #IW-11-48:
Mr. LaMuniere was concerned about erosion among the plantings along the boundary line and noted also that the boulders shown on the site plan had not been placed as approved. He thought perhaps if the boulders had been correctly installed there would not be so much erosion flowing toward the adjoining property. Mr. Papsin asked why two 4 inch pipes had been installed under the driveway instead of the one on the plan and why all the work done had not been completed according to the approved plan. Mr. Wadelton thought that Mr. Sabin, landscape architect, should be required to attend the next meeting to answer these questions and resolve the outstanding issues. When Mr. Ajello said he had not responded to Mr. Caroe’s latest letter, Mr. Wadelton asked him to do so. Also, Mr. Ajello was asked to notify Mr. Sabin that the Commission wants him to attend the next meeting and to invite the Smiths and Mr. Caroe to attend if they’d like to hear the discussion. Further discussion was tabled until Mr. Sabin is in attendance.
There were no communications or administrative business to consider.
MOTION:
To adjourn the meeting. By Mr. LaMuniere.Mr. Wadelton adjourned the meeting at 8:01 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill
Land Use Administrator
Posted: April 17, 2013 March 13, 2013
7:00 p.m., Upper Level Meeting Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Bedini, Mr. LaMuniere, Mr. Papsin, Mr. Wadelton
MEMBER ABSENT: Ms. Cheney
ALTERNATE ABSENT: Mr. Martino
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Ajello, Mrs. Hill
ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Neff, Mr. Alex, Mr. BowmanMr. Bedini called the Meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. and seated Members Bedini, LaMuniere, Papsin, and Wadelton. He noted there was no subsequent business to add to the agenda.
Consideration of the Minutes
The 2/27/13 Regular Meeting minutes were accepted as corrected. In the 7th line on page 2, “is he” should be “is the.”MOTION:
To accept the 2/27/13 Regular Meeting minutes as corrected.
By Mr. Papsin, seconded by Mr. LaMuniere, and passed 4-0.Pending Application
Kessler/103-105 West Mountain Road/#IW-13-03/Driveway, Utilities, Well, Fence:
Mr. Neff, engineer, presented his plans, both revised to 3/10/13; “Driveway Culvert Plan,” “Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan,” 2 sheets. He noted the plans had been updated to include the sediment barrier downstream of the culvert and the detail of the sediment filter construction. Mr. Papsin asked if the electrical trench and culvert would be dug at the same time. Mr. Neff said they would and that this would be done quickly in a month or two when conditions were drier. Mr. Neff said that Steep Rock, holder of the conservation easement on the property, had submitted a letter dated 3/12/13 stating that it had no objections to the proposed activities. Mr. Charles reviewed the project narrative and asked whether the underground drainage system that would collect runoff from the tennis courts and roof drains would be adequate for large storm events. He noted that for the previous application for this address, the Commission had required a rip rapped channel at the outlet of the storage tank. Mr. Neff pointed out the location of the outflow pipe and said any discharge would flow over grassed lawn and that this would be adequate for this application because there was a very small watershed and the previous plans had proposed a lot more impervious surfaces. Mr. Ajello noted the outlet was 100 feet from the wetlands and the area between the outlet and the wetlands was naturally vegetated. When asked if the size of the proposed driveway culvert was adequate, Mr. Neff stated that although it would be sunk into the ground, it would still be 3 ft. wide and 2 ft. high so it would have no problem handling storm flow.MOTION:
To approve Application #IW-13-03 to install a driveway, utilities, wall, and fence for Kessler, 103-105 West Mountain Road per the plans, “Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan,” 2 sheets, and “Driveway Culvert Plan,” both by Mr. Neff and dated 2/11/13 and revised to 3/10/13; the duration of the permit shall be 2 years and approval is subject to the following conditions:
1. that the Land Use Office be notified at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work so the WEO can inspect and approve the erosion control measures,
2. that the property owner give the contractor copies of both the motion of approval and approved plans prior to the commencement of work, and
3. any change to the plans as approved must be submitted immediately to the Commission for reapproval.
By Mr. Papsin, seconded by Mr. LaMuniere, and passed 4-0.
New Application
Regional School District #12/159 South Street/#IW-13-04/Stream Crossing:
Mr. Alex explained he was a senior working on his senior project and presented the plans, “2012 Senior Project,” unsigned, dated November 2012 and “Property/Boundary Survey, Site Analysis Plan,” by T. Michael Alex, dated February 2004, revised to 3/4/13. He proposed to install a 24 inch culvert to cross an intermittent stream and noted the location on the map. When asked how he had determined the diameter of the pipe, he responded that there was not much flow in the existing channel and that this area was fed with a 24 inch pipe. Mr. Bedini asked how the pipe would be placed in the stream. Mr. Alex said the pipe would be installed 4 inches into the channel, flares would be installed at the ends to help prevent further erosion along the banks, and 3 to 5 yards of fill from a local farm would be placed over it. Mr. Bedini asked where the fill would end and how he would prevent it from washing out. Mr. Alex said the fill would have a gentle grade, would be made into a grassed path, and he drew a diagram to illustrate his plan. Mr. Bedini noted the pool water is emptied into the pond and then flows downstream. Mr. Alex noted, however, that the flow is controlled. Mr. Ajello asked if the culvert was ever plugged, whether the water would flow towards the track. Mr. Alex said, no, the crossing was at a point lower in elevation than the track and any overflow would just continue down the stream. Mr. Alex expected this would be a one day project and said he would seed and mulch on the same day the rest of the work was done.
The Commission asked that the following information be added to or deleted from the plans:
1) dimensions to be put on the plan,
2) enlarge the cross section and include dimensions,
3) specify the width and length of the crossing,
4) provide slope information and pipe length,
5) delete the alternate plan,
6) specify how deep into the stream the culvert will be placed,
7) specify how many yards of what kind of fill,
8) provide a very detailed construction,
9) describe how the hay bales will be staked,
10) provide details re: seeding and mulching,for example, the kind of grass seed,
11) add the limit of disturbance to the plan, and
12) make sure the construction sequence includes notifying the Land Use Office at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of construction so that the WEO can inspect and approve the erosion control measures and again upon completion of the work.
Enforcement
Smith/22 Parsonage Lane/Violation of Permit:
Mr. Ajello read the 3/11/13 letter from Mr. Caroe, which complained that two pipes that direct runoff to the southwest corner of the Caroe property have been installed on the Smith property at 22 Parsonage Lane. Five photos taken on various dates of these pipes and resulting ponding water were circulated. The approved plan dated 4/24/12 for the Smith property was reviewed and Mr. Ajello noted what work had been done that was not in compliance with this plan. This included:
1) two pipes were installed instead of the one approved,
2) the pipes were longer than what had been approved,
3) a berm was installed instead of a line of boulders.
Mr. Ajello read his 3/13/13 enforcement report concerning 22 Parsonage Lane. The drainage system for this property was discussed at length. It was noted that any changes to the approved plan were supposed to come back to the Commission for approval, but this had not been done. It was also noted that this was the responsibility of the property owners. Mr. Ajello said he would inform the Smiths about all of the discrepancies and said he would not sign off that the work had been properly completed until these have been addressed. The 12/10/11 plan for the originally proposed retaining wall and then Mr. Sabin’s January 11, 2012 letter and plan to install boulders instead of the wall were reviewed. Mr. Wadelton noted the installation of the berm had not been approved and it was not functioning correctly as sedimentation was occurring. Mr. Papsin and Mr. Wadelton considered the situation to be a violation because the work done significantly differed from the approved plan. Mr. Bedini requested, and the rest of the commissioners agreed, that Mr. Ajello should send a letter to the Smiths without making any recommendations about how to address the discrepancies and how to solve the current drainage problems. It was the consensus that a proper design was the responsibility of the property owners. Mr. Ajello will also research past minutes for details regarding the exact plan approved by the Commission. Mr. Ajello agreed to amend his letter before mailing it to the Smiths.
Enforcement Report
In addition to the information included in Mr. Ajello’s 3/13/13 report, the following was noted:EIS Realty, LLC./92 Bee Brook Road:
Mr. Ajello reported that much of the excavated material would be taken off site.Lautier/56 June Road:
Mr. Ajello stated that Mr. Lautier was doing stonework that was not indicated on the approved plan, although most of it was further than 50 ft. to any wetlands. The exception is the construction of a stonewall within 50 ft. of a “drainage path.” He said if this is a watercourse, it would violate the Zoning Regulations.Woodruff/3 West Shore Road:
Several commissioners noted that Mr. Woodruff had burned some of the material he had been asked to remove instead of removing it. Several trees were burned and it was thought they were destroyed. It was noted that Mr. Woodruff had withdrawn his application to correct a violation because he could not accomplish the work the Commission had requested before the ground was covered with snow, but he had said he would resubmit in the spring. The commissioners agreed they would reinspect the property when the application was resubmitted.MOTION:
To adjourn the Meeting. By Mr. LaMuniere.Mr. Bedini adjourned the Meeting at 8:17 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill, Land Use Administrator
Posted: March 6, 2013 February 27, 2013
7:00 p.m., Upper Level Meeting Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. Bedini, Mr. LaMuniere, Mr. Papsin
ALTERNATE PRESENT: Mr. Martino
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Ajello, Mrs. Hill
ALSO PRESENT: Mr. Neff, PressMr. Bedini called the Meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. and seated Members Bedini, LaMuniere, and Papsin and Alternate Martino. It was noted there was no subsequent business to add to the agenda.
Consideration of the Minutes
MOTION:
To accept the 2/13/13 Regular Meeting minutes as written.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Mr. Papsin, and passed 4-0.
New Applications
Mnuchin/218 Nettleton Hollow Road/#IW-13-01/Pesticide Application to Pond:
Mr. Ajello briefly reviewed past applications, citing the 5/24/10 report from Mrs. Corrigan, Conservation Commission, that the proposed work would not be harmful to the wood turtles and Jefferson salamanders in the area. He also noted that a condition of approval had been that the pond outlet be capped for two weeks after the chemical application. He read the 5/23/12 minutes and motion of approval, which granted a two year permit with conditions. It was noted then that the current permit would not expire until 5/23/14 and so an IWC application was not required at this time.Wallgren and Rook/136 Old Litchfield Road/#IW-13-02/Pesticide Application to Pond:
Mr. Ajello circulated an aerial photo of the pond. It was noted there is a current permit, which will not expire until May 2013. Mr. Ajello will contact Mr. Gambino, contractor, to ask if the work will be done before that date.Kessler/103-105 West Mountain Road/#IW-13-03/Driveway, Utilities, Well, Fence:
Mr. Neff, engineer, presented his plans, “Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan,” dated 2/11/13 and “Driveway Culvert Plan,” dated 2/11/13. He explained the current proposal is on a separate lot from the primary dwelling and is a scaled down version of what had been submitted a few years ago. He also noted that this lot is less constrained by wetlands than the main house lot. The only work that will disturb wetlands is he proposed driveway crossing over the intermittent stream. An existing bridge will be removed and a culvert installed through the narrowest section of wetlands. Mr. Neff stated the culvert has three times the capacity required for a 100 year storm. It will be sunk into the ground so the bottom twelve inches can be filled with natural materials. A stone headwall will be constructed on both sides of the driveway. One hundredth of an acre of wetlands will be disturbed. Proposed work in the regulated area includes the driveway, well, and propane tank. Mr. LaMuniere asked if the limit of disturbance was the same as for the previous application. Mr. Neff said it was smaller. Mr. Neff discussed the proposed drainage system for the tennis court and roof runoff, which will be directed to a strip drain along the lower side of the area, to a catch basin, and then to an underground drainage system. Mr. Martino noted that a trench for the electrical service was proposed along the driveway. When asked why the proposed erosion controls did not cross the wetlands, Mr. Neff replied that they would create a dam and that the work would be completed quickly so there would not be much opportunity for erosion. Mr. Ajello said it would take longer to build the headwalls through the wetlands and asked if temporary erosion control measures had been considered. Although Mr. Neff said the stream had a low flow since there was only an 8.2 acre watershed above it and that the wetlands soils on site had a high clay content and so were generally stable, he agreed to add the installation of wire and hay across the wetlands. Mr. Ajello asked why the conduit was located outside the headwalls. Mr. Neff said the conduit trench would be under the stream and was separate from the driveway due to minimum clearance requirements for the culvert. Mr. LaMuniere noted the stream had almost no flow during previous site inspections and so thought the culvert was adequately sized. Steep Rock holds an easement on the property and has yet to submit a letter approving the proposed work. Mr. Neff noted that commissioners who want to inspect the site on their own prior to the next meeting should call the property owners.
Enforcement Report
Information that was not included in Mr. Ajello’s 2-27-13 report included the following.EIS Realty, LLC./92 Bee Brook Road:
Mr. Ajello OK’s a minor change to the approved plan. A twelve inch trench will be dug around the building so that the foundation can be insulated.Ingrassia/143 East Shore Road:
The construction of the retaining wall along the state right of way was discussed in detail.
MOTION:
To adjourn the Meeting. By Mr. LaMuniere.Mr. Bedini adjourned the Meeting at 7:56 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill
Land Use Administrator
Posted: February 18, 2013 February 13, 2013
7:00 p.m., Land Use Meeting Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ms. Cheney, Mr. LaMuniere, Mr. Papsin, Mr. Wadelton
MEMBER ABSENT: Mr. Bedini
ALTERNATE ABSENT: Mr. Martino
STAFF PRESENT: Mrs. Hill
ALSO PRESENT: Mr. TalbotMr. Wadelton called the Meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. and seated Members Cheney, Papsin, LaMuniere, and Wadelton.
He noted there was no subsequent business to add to the agenda.Consideration of the Minutes
MOTION:
To accept the 1/23/13 Regular Meeting minutes as written.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Mr. Papsin, and passed 4-0.
There were no new applications.
Other Business
Community Table Restaurant/223, 227 Litchfield Turnpike/Request to Amend Permit #IW-12-36/Change Driveway Culvert Headwall Construction:
Mr. Talbot, architect, presented the plan, “Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan,” by Mr. Neff, dated 10/2/12 and revised to 2/2/13 and explained the minor change proposed. The approved headwall was pre cast concrete block, whereas the proposed headwall was natural stone with a timber guard rail. Mr. Talbot said there would be no change in the width of the crossing but its length would increase from 23 feet to 25 feet. He then read the 2/6/13 letter from Mr. Neff, engineer, to the Commission.MOTION:
To approve the amendment to Permit #IW-12-36 issued to the Community Table Restaurant at 223, 227 Litchfield Turnpike to change the driveway headwall construction per the plan, “Soil Erosion and Sediment Control Plan, by Mr. Neff, revised to 2/2/13.
By Mr. Papsin, seconded by Mr. LaMuniere, and passed 4-0.
There were no enforcement issues or administrative business to discuss.
MOTION: To adjourn the Meeting. By Ms. Cheney.
Mr. Wadelton adjourned the Meeting at 7:13 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill, Land Use Administrator
Posted: February 12, 2013 January 23, 2013
7:00 p.m., Upper Level Meeting Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. LaMuniere, Mr. Papsin, Mr. Wadelton
ALTERNATE PRESENT: Mr. Martino
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Bedini, Ms. Cheney
STAFF PRESENT: Mrs. Hill
ALSO PRESENT:Mr, Neff, PressMr. Wadelton called the Meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. and seated Members LaMuniere, Papsin, and Wadelton and Alternate Martino for Mr. Bedini. It was noted there was no subsequent business to add to the agenda.
Consideration of the Minutes
MOTION:
To accept the 1/9/13 Regular Meeting minutes as written.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Mr. Papsin, and passed 4-0.
Pending Application
Woodruff/3 West Shore Road/#IW-12-41/Application to Correct a Violation:
Mrs. Hill reported that Mr. Woodruff had withdrawn the application. Due to winter conditions he had been unable to accomplish the cleaning out of debris necessary to enable the Commission to conduct a meaningful site inspection and the time limit for acting on the application would have run out before the next meeting. Mr. Woodruff wrote that he expects to resubmit in the spring.
Other Business
Ingrassia/143 East Shore Road/Request to Amend Permit #IW-12-01/ Construct Retaining Wall:
Mr. Neff, engineer, explained the purpose of the retaining wall was for structural support of the steep embankment near the septic system fill area. He said it would prevent the fill from sliding into the lake. The wall would be covered with soil so that the appearance of the embankment would not change. Mr. Neff stated that a non degradable one inch thick multiple layer woven mat equivalent to thirty inches of rip rap would be installed over the wall to help hold the soil. He said this type of mat works well for permanent stabilization. It was noted the 1/17/13 cover letter and fee had been submitted and the plans, “Septic System Repair Plan,” by Mr. Neff, revised to 11/15/12 were reviewed.MOTION:
To approve the amendment to Permit #IW-12-01 issued to Ingrassia/143 East Shore Road to add the construction of a retaining wall per the plan, Septic System Repair Plan,” by Mr. Neff, dated 12/4/11 and revised to 11/15/12, noting that all of the original conditions of approval apply.
By Mr. Martino, seconded by Mr. Papsin, and passed 4-0.
Enforcement Report
Mr. Ajello’s 1/23/13 Enforcement Report was briefly reviewed.
MOTION:
To adjourn the Meeting. By Mr. Martino.There being no further business, Mr. Wadelton adjourned the Meeting at 7:13 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill, Land Use Administrator
Posted: January 15, 2013 January 9, 2013
7:00 p.m., Upper Level Meeting RoomMEMBERS PRESENT: Ms. Cheney, Mr. LaMuniere, Mr. Papsin, Mr. Wadelton
MEMBER ABSENT: Mr. Bedini
ALTERNATE ABSENT: Mr. Martino
STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Ajello, Mrs. Hill
ALSO PRESENT: Mr. MoranMr. Wadelton called the Meeting to order at 7:03 p.m. and seated Members Cheney, LaMuniere, Papsin, and Wadelton.
MOTION:
To include subsequent business not already posted on the agenda:
VIII. Administrative Business:
A. Review of Wykeham Rise, LLC. Settlement Agreement.
By Mr. Papsin, seconded by Mr. LaMuniere, and passed 4-0.Consideration of the Minutes
MOTION:
To accept the 12/12/12 Regular Meeting minutes as written.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Ms. Cheney, and passed 4-0.
Pending Applications
Woodruff/3 West Shore Road/#IW-12-41/Application to Correct a Violation:
It was noted that Mr. Woodruff had not contacted the Land Use Office to report on whether he had completed the removal of the debris from the site and that the 65 day period in which the Commission must act on the application would be up at the next meeting on January 23. Mrs. Hill will contact Mr. Woodruff.EIS Realty, LLC./92 Bee Brook Road/#IW-12-42/Expand Parking Lot, Install Drainage System, Add Dumpster with Enclosure, Generator, Utilities, Sidewalks, Stoops, etc.:
Mr. Moran of Indigo Land Design presented the site plan by Indigo Land Design, revised to 1/9/13. The revised map included the limit of disturbance line and the utility trench for the generator. He circulated several photos of the site. Mr. Moran pointed out the location of the proposed erosion controls, the wetlands, the ponding area, and the 100 ft. review area and discussed the drainage on the property. He noted the wetlands had been delineated by a soil scientist. He said the purpose of the wetlands was water rejuvenation and that the minor drainage improvements proposed would alleviate potential flooding, but would not prevent the wetlands from functioning as they normally do. He noted the DOT had granted permission to tie into the state drainage system. Mr. Papsin asked if there would be any work in the wetlands. Mr. Moran said there would not. Mr. Papsin asked if the curved driveway in front of the building would be removed. Mr. Moran said it would not. It was noted the property owner had signed the application form. Mr. LaMuniere stated that he had inspected the property before it had snowed and had found no problems with the application in terms of impacts to wetlands or watercourses. Mr. Papsin and Ms. Cheney agreed.MOTION:
To approve Application #IW-12-42 submitted by EIS Realty, LLC. to expand the parking lot, install a drainage system, add a dumpster with enclosure, generator, utilities, sidewalks, stoops, etc. at 92 Bee Brook Road per the site plan by Indigo Land Design, LLC., dated 10/24/12, and revised to 1/9/13; the permit shall be valid for two years and is subject to the following conditions:
1. that the Land Use Office be notified at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work so the WEO can inspect and approve the erosion control measures,
2. that the property owner give the contractor copies of both the motion of approval and approved plans prior to the commencement of work, and
3. any change to the plans as approved must be submitted immediately to the Commission for reapproval.
By Mr. LaMuniere, seconded by Mr. Papsin, and passed 4-0.
There were no new applications.
Other Business
Ingrassia/143 East Shore Road/Request to Revise Permit #IW-12-01/ Construction of Retaining Wall:
It was noted that the $25 fee had not yet been paid. Mr. Ajello said he had discussed the construction of the retaining wall with the contractor who said to stabilize the steep slope a cellular containment system would be used and this would be covered with a mat. This would help hold the soil in place so that vegetation can be established. Mr. Ajello also reviewed the construction process for the retaining wall along the road.
Enforcement Report
In addition to the information included in Mr. Ajello’s 1/9/13 report, the following matter was discussed.
Smith/22 Parsonage Lane:
Mr. Ajello noted that the neighbors were still concerned about the drainage, which he said, was difficult to analyze now due to the frozen ground and snow cover. He said the installation of a catch basin for the depressed lawn area had been discussed, but it had not been installed. He will continue to monitor the property.
Communications
Mr. Wadelton noted the 1/9/13 email from Mr. Perrin to Mr. Bedini, which stated that due to new work obligations he would not be able to serve on the Commission.
Administrative Business
Review of Wykeham Rise, LLC. Settlement Agreement:
Mr. Wadelton explained that on 1/7/13 the Zoning Commission had agreed to a proposed settlement re: the appeal of its denial of the Wykeham Rise, LLC. application for an inn at 101 Wykeham Road. He said the plan approved was essentially the same plan the Inland Wetlands Commission had approved for the university. Several minor changes were noted such as the removal of three parking spaces close to the entrance and the increase in width of the grass paver maintenance access to the pool from 10 feet to 20 feet. Mr. LaMuniere asked if there had been any changes to the drainage system approved by the IWC. Mr. Ajello said there had not. It was the consensus that none of the changes impacted wetlands or were under the IWC’s jurisdiction.
MOTION:
To adjourn the Meeting. By Ms. Cheney.There being no other business Mr. Wadelton adjourned the Meeting at 7:35 p.m.
FILED SUBJECT TO APPROVAL
Respectfully submitted,
Janet M. Hill, Land Use Administrator
Meetings in 2012